<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Wine Critics on Sommo — AI Wine Scanner, WSET Prep &amp; Wine Journal App</title><link>https://sommo.app/tags/wine-critics/</link><description>Recent content in Wine Critics on Sommo — AI Wine Scanner, WSET Prep &amp; Wine Journal App</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Sommo</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sommo.app/tags/wine-critics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The 90-Point Wine Trap: Why Critic Scores Often Mislead and What to Trust</title><link>https://sommo.app/blog/90-point-wine-trap-critic-scores/</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://sommo.app/blog/90-point-wine-trap-critic-scores/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Walk into any wine shop in 2026 and the shelf-talkers tell the same story. &amp;ldquo;Wine Spectator: 92 points.&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;Robert Parker: 94 points.&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;Decanter: 95 points.&amp;rdquo; The score is everywhere, plastered on bottles, displayed on price tags, repeated on websites, used to justify markup. And for the wine drinker trying to make a decent decision, the score has become quietly useless. Not because critics are dishonest, but because the system has been gamed, inflated, and stretched so far that a 90-point rating now tells you almost nothing about whether you will enjoy the wine.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>