Delectable was the wine app that people in the trade actually used. Clean, fast, and full of sommeliers whose notes were worth reading. Vivino was the one everyone else had.
For a few years that was a real choice: scale versus signal. In 2026 it is a different conversation, because one of these apps has stopped moving.
The Short Answer
Vivino is the living option. Around 70 million users, 16 million wines, the fastest scanner in the category, and active development. Free with ads, Premium at $4.99 a month or $47.90 a year in the US as of mid-2026.
Delectable was the better-tasting app and may still work fine on your phone, but its iOS app last updated in September 2021 and its Android app in April 2024. Premium has sat at $5.99 a month, unchanged since 2017.
If you are choosing today, that gap is the headline. Everything else is detail.
| Vivino | Delectable | |
|---|---|---|
| Last major updates | Actively developed | iOS Sept 2021; Android April 2024 |
| Community | Mass consumer, around 70m users | Trade and sommelier-leaning |
| Label scanning | Fastest in the category | Human-verified transcription |
| Notes | Free text and stars | Simple ratings and free text |
| Cellar | Basic, Premium-gated | None |
| Price data | Community prices plus marketplace | Limited |
| Education | None | None |
| Price | Free with ads; Premium $4.99/mo or $47.90/yr | Free; Premium $5.99/mo, unchanged since 2017 |
What Vivino Does Well
Coverage and speed. Vivino’s database is the biggest in consumer wine, and it shows most in the awkward cases: an obscure co-op bottling, a supermarket own-label, something from a region you cannot pronounce. Point the camera, get an answer.
The commerce layer is genuinely useful too. Community price data plus a built-in marketplace means the verdict and the purchase live in one place, which is exactly what you want standing in a shop.
Where it thins: the ratings compress into a narrow band, mostly between roughly 3.5 and 4.2, so they separate bad from fine but rarely fine from excellent. Reviews are unstructured. And the free tier has been narrowing, most notably with restaurant wine-list scanning moving behind Premium after years of being free.
What Delectable Did Well
Signal. Delectable’s community was disproportionately sommeliers, importers, and trade, and the feed read like it. A note from someone who tastes 300 wines a month is worth more than an average of 4,000 casual ratings, and Delectable made those notes easy to find.
The label transcription deserves a mention too. Rather than trusting automation alone, Delectable used human verification, which produced unusually accurate entries, especially on handwritten, foreign-language, and unusual labels where scanners typically fail.
And the logging flow was fast. Photograph the bottle, add a rating, move on. As a pure bottle diary it was one of the nicest things in the category.
Where it fell down, beyond maintenance: no cellar management, no structured tasting framework, no education, and no serious price data. It was a log and a feed, and it never tried to be more.
Head to Head
Scanning a Label
Vivino for speed and coverage. Delectable for accuracy on difficult labels, historically, thanks to human verification. On an unmaintained app, though, accuracy you cannot rely on going forward is a thin advantage.
Quality of What You Read
Delectable, when it was healthy. A trade-heavy community produces better notes than a mass-market one, and that was its entire reason for existing. Vivino’s feed is broader and noisier.
Managing a Collection
Vivino, by default. Its cellar is basic and Premium-gated, but Delectable has none at all. Neither is a serious answer if you have a real cellar. That job belongs to dedicated cellar apps.
Prices and Buying
Vivino, comfortably. This is not a category Delectable competed in.
Long-Term Safety of Your Notes
Vivino. This is the uncomfortable one. A wine journal is a long-term document: five years of notes are worth far more than five weeks. Trusting that document to an app with no iOS update since 2021 is a risk that grows with every OS release. Whatever you use, check that you can export your data.
Getting Better at Wine
Neither. Both give you a text box and a star rating. Neither has a tasting framework, neither tells you what your notes are missing, and neither offers any learning path. You end up with a list of bottles rather than a developing palate.
Who Should Pick Vivino
Almost anyone choosing today. It is the living app, it covers the most wine, and the free tier does the core job. If you liked Delectable for its social feed, Vivino has a social feed, just with a broader and less expert population.
Who Should Stay on Delectable
If it is already on your phone, still working, and you only want a lightweight bottle diary, there is no urgency to move. But export your data, and know that every OS update is a roll of the dice.
The Thing Both Were Missing All Along
Here is what is worth noticing about this comparison: the app people preferred, Delectable, won on the quality of other people’s notes. Not on the quality of yours.
That is the unexamined assumption in the whole category. Both apps treat you as a reader of expertise rather than someone acquiring it. You log a bottle, you read what a sommelier wrote, you feel briefly better informed, and six months later you still cannot describe why one Chablis tastes different from another.
Sommo inverts that. AI label scanning returns a briefing on the region, grape, and style rather than a score. Tasting notes follow the WSET-style SAT structure, appearance through to conclusions, and the AI marks them: what you caught, what you missed, where your description drifted from the wine’s actual profile. Over time, character analysis turns that journal into a palate profile you can actually read. And WSET exam prep for Levels 1 to 4 sits alongside it if you want to formalise the knowledge.
For anyone specifically mourning Delectable, the practical parallels are these: the logging is fast, the journal is yours, CSV and Excel export are free and in the app, and it ships regularly on iOS, Android, and the browser rather than sitting still for five years.
Where it does not compete: no marketplace, no price comparison, no crowd average, and no trade-heavy social feed. Sommo is not a place to read sommeliers. It is a place to become a better taster yourself.
All Three, Side by Side
| Sommo | Vivino | Delectable | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Actively developed | Yes, iOS, Android and web | Yes | iOS last updated Sept 2021 |
| Label scanning | AI briefing with context | Fastest, biggest database | Human-verified, historically |
| Structured tasting | SAT notes with AI feedback | Free text and stars | Ratings and free text |
| Learns your palate | Yes, from your journal | No | No |
| Social feed | Opt-in sharing surfaces | Yes, mass consumer | Yes, trade-leaning |
| Cellar | Full cellar with AI pairing | Basic, Premium | None |
| Price data | No | Yes, plus marketplace | Limited |
| WSET prep | Levels 1 to 4 | No | No |
| Data export | CSV and Excel, free | Limited | Limited |
| Price | Free tier; Premium from $2.50/mo yearly | Free with ads; $4.99/mo | Free; Premium $5.99/mo |
The Bottom Line
Delectable was better than Vivino at the thing it cared about, and that is worth saying plainly. A community of serious tasters is hard to build and easy to lose.
But a wine app is a long-term relationship with your own notes, and the iOS release date settles this one. Vivino is the safe choice between these two in 2026.
If what you actually miss is being surrounded by people who taste well, the honest answer is that no feed will make you better. Structure, feedback, and repetition will. Try Sommo free, or read Sommo vs Delectable and Sommo vs Vivino.
Vivino or Delectable in 2026?
